The student news site of Franklin Delano Roosevelt High School

The New Dealer

The student news site of Franklin Delano Roosevelt High School

The New Dealer

The student news site of Franklin Delano Roosevelt High School

The New Dealer

Anna Sorokin – A Modern-Day Anti-Heroine?


In the glimmering, glamorous lanes of New York City’s elite, the story of Anna Sorokin, known as Anna Delvy, unfolds like a classic thriller mystery. Her story, filled with deception, luxury, and a daring defiance of societal norms, takes us deep into the heart of how ambitious an illusion can be.

Sorokin’s criminal charges read like chapters from a Netflix Script, literally. Sorokin’s story is currently a popular Netflix story called “Inventing Anna” based off her Grand Larceny in the Second- and Third-Degrees criminal charges. These charges paint her as a mastermind of deception, cleverly robbing several large sums from banks and the affluent. The Theft of Services charges add a mysterious aura to her persona, depicting her as an eerie figure gliding through luxury hotels and spaces, leaving only a trail of unpaid bills and Instagram posts behind. According to Justice Kieel, “Anna Delevy showed no remorse,” when rejecting a plea deal between Delevy and the Manhattan District Attorney. The implication of Sorokin portraying herself as yet another influential member of the Elite, uncaring towards punishment when served hot, leaves many to ask, “Is she really just an actress and not another one-percenter?”.

Currently, the discussion of Sorokin’s criminal actions leaves many jealous of her ability to simply attract New York’s hottest and wealthiest. Yet for some, Sorokin’s ability to infiltrate New York’s high society without any real wealth reveals the gaps in the armor of a materialistic world. Her story becomes an eye-opener, reflecting the vulnerabilities of a society where appearance often trumps merit and integrity. In her audacious exploits, Sorokin emerges not just as a con artist, but as a commentator on the gaping inequalities and superficialities of the world she infiltrated. As Julia Garner, an actress in Sorokin’s documentary stated, “She’s very gentle. But then her voice gets less soft-spoken when she wants something.” Even when in prison, Sorokin continues to push herself further from others. When one is in prison, they are severed with minimal rights yet Sorokin attempts to push that idea to its limit. In the documentary for example, she begs for a private meeting with a journalist. What does a private meeting entail in prison? Hot coffee, hot tea, closer proximity between prisoner and vistee, and other luxuries most prisoners aren’t afforded. Yet this is all allowed because Sorokin remains to be influential even in an orange jumpsuit.

In a striking declaration to the New York Times, Sorokin once said, “The thing is, I’m not sorry. I’d be lying to you and everyone else and myself if I said I was sorry for anything. I regret the way I went about certain things.” This bold assertion captures the essence of Sorokin’s character. It’s not a confession, nor a plea for sympathy, but a direct acknowledgment of her journey and choices. Her lack of remorse adds a layer of intrigue and defiance to her persona, akin to the anti-heroines of dark, psychological dramas. Yet speaks for the personality of the Elite in control, many who commit these audacious crimes worse than Sorokin’s fail to admit their remorse in any way, rather they’re apologizing for how their actions played out. Sorokin’s behavior matches even when in prison to her elite counterparts, highlighting the lack of difference between an actor and an actual elitist.

A remarkable twist in the media narrative came with Rachel DeLoache Williams’ criticism of Netflix’s “Inventing Anna.” Williams, who claimed to have been conned out of more than $60,000 by Sorokin during a trip to Marrakesh, accused Netflix of, “running a con woman’s P.R.” This accusation adds a significant layer to the media’s role in Sorokin’s story. Williams’ criticism highlights a tension in media portrayals: the balance between storytelling and perceived glorification of criminal behavior. Her critique brings forth questions about the moralities of storytelling, especially when it involves real-life criminal cases. It challenges the audience to consider whether portrayals inadvertently glamorize the criminal, shifting the focus from their crimes to their personality and backstory. The media in this instance, becomes a participant in the narrative, influencing public opinion and potentially reshaping the legacy of the individuals involved. In some sense, they can create public pressure for a change in result leading many to question the ethics of media involvement.

The extensive coverage of Sorokin’s story across various media platforms has elevated her from a mere subject of a news report to a character in a societal drama. Each article, documentary, and social media post adds to the carefully plotted aspect of her persona, painting her as a modern-day anti-heroine. This amplification by the media plays a critical role in how the public perceives Sorokin, transforming her into a symbol of larger societal issues such as the obsession with wealth and the impact of social media on perception. The media’s portrayal of Sorokin’s life and actions allows a deeper exploration of journalism controlling and shaping public perception. Through their narrative choices, framing, and emphasis, media outlets have the power to influence how stories are received and understood by the public. In Sorokin’s case, the media has not only reported facts but also crafted a narrative that resonates with broader themes of deception, ambition, and the pursuit of status allowing many to sympathize with Sorokin.

The media’s extensive focus on Sorokin’s story reflects our society’s fascination with tales of downfall and redemption, glamour and deceit. It raises questions about our collective attraction to stories that blur the lines between villain and victim, and the extent to which media narratives reflect or shape societal values. In the end, the media’s coverage of Anna Sorokin influenced and critiqued by various stakeholders like Rachel DeLoache Williams, serves as a compelling case study of the power of storytelling. It demonstrates how media narratives can transform real-life events into complex, multifaceted stories that capture public imagination and provoke critical discourse about the society we live in.

As the final chapter of Sorokin’s story remains unwritten, her story continues to captivate and puzzle. Was she a villainous mastermind, a victim of her ambition, or a symbol of societal decay? Like a true mystery, her story leaves us with more questions than answers, inviting each reader to don the detective’s hat and draw their conclusions.

Leave a Comment

Comments (0)

All The New Dealer Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *